The Journal of History     Spring 2007    TABLE OF CONTENTS


Let Sibel Edmonds Speak

To: The House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

A Petition to require public hearings by the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform into confirmed reports by FBI Whistleblower Sibel Edmonds of wrongdoing, criminal activities, cover-ups against the security and interests of the United States and its citizenry, and the erroneous use of the State Secrets Privilege to shut down all court proceedings in her case.

In March 2002 the Department of Justice's Office of the Inspector General (DOJ-IG) began its investigation of Ms. Edmonds' reports. In June 2002, in at least two unclassified Senate briefings, FBI officials confirmed the validity of Ms. Edmonds' reports; however, in May 2004 Attorney General Ashcroft retroactively classified information from these briefings and gagged the Congress, preventing further investigation.

In October 2002 Attorney General Ashcroft invoked the State Secrets Privilege' to block all court proceedings in Edmonds' case. In July 2004 the DOJ-IG investigation into Edmonds' dismissal was completed but was entirely classified. In January 2005 the DOJ-IG released an unclassified summary report on Edmonds' case which concluded that Edmonds was fired for reporting serious security breaches & misconduct in the agency's translation program, and that many of her allegations were supported by other witnesses and documents.

The issues that were reported by Ms. Edmonds include:

*Cases of espionage activities within the FBI, DOD, and the Department of State
*Cases of cover-up of information and leads pre and post 9/11, under the excuse of protecting certain diplomatic relations
*Cases of intentional blocking and mistranslation of crucial intelligence by FBI translators and management
*Cases of foreign entities bribing certain government officials and elected representatives

Edmonds filed a whistleblower lawsuit against the Department of Justice, but the government successfully argued that the state secrets privilege was an absolute bar to her suit going forward. She was even barred from the courtroom during the argument of her appeal! The Supreme Court declined to review the case.

The government's invocation of the state secrets privilege in a motion to dismiss her case contradicts the core idea of judicial review and essentially allows the Executive Branch to dictate to the federal courts what cases they can and cannot hear.

Invoking the State Secrets Privilege is a tactic frequently used by the Executive Branch to stop potentially embarrassing lawsuits against the government. Many of these suits are brought by government employees, such as Ms. Edmonds, who alleges fraud, mismanagement, and other unlawful conduct, and the state secrets privilege has successfully been invoked by the government to silence them.

The state secrets provision has been used too frequently and with too little public protection. Given the seriousness of Ms. Edmonds' reports and in the best interests of the security of the country, it is incumbent upon the Congress to exercise its oversight responsibilities and authority as representatives of the people of the United States, therefore:

We, the undersigned, now call upon the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform in Congress to hold public hearings into the case of FBI Whistleblower Sibel Edmonds, and the erroneous use of the State Secrets Privilege to shut down all court proceedings in her case.

Mr. David Gould
Redding, California


The Journal of History - Spring 2007 Copyright © 2007 by News Source, Inc.