THE MEDIA HAS BEEN SILENT ABOUT VACCINES
Vaccine information for you
THE MEDIA HAS BEEN AS SILENT ABOUT THE VACCINES AS THEY'VE BEEN ON ALL THE HARD EVIDENCE ABOUT THE 2000 ELECTION AND ALL THE TERRORISMThere is a very big problem with the vaccines, folks. Don't forget that US Air Force pilots said they would rather resign their commissions rather than risk the anthrax and other vaccines. The US Air Force relented and let them remain in the military without taking the vaccines. Do research! Get that story from the newspapers. Contact parents whose children contracted autism from the MMR vaccine. There is a reason why they are pushing the anthrax and rubella vaccines. These live virus vaccines are unstable and unpredictable, made under highly questionable circumstances. DON'T FORGET, THEIR JUSTIFICATION FOR SHELLING OUT ALL THOSE TAX DOLLARS TO BUY MILLIONS OF DOLLARS WORTH OF ANTHRAX VACCINES WAS BECAUSE OF THE ANTHRAX ATTACKS ON CIVILIANS AND DEMOCRATS. THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION AND RIGHT WING REPUBLICANS (they are very different from good Republicans) SAID IT WAS PART OF THE SAME TERRORISM OF SEPTEMBER 11. THEN WE LEARNED THE ANTHRAX ACTUALLY CAME FROM OUR MILITARY. NOW THEY STILL WANT US TO TAKE THE SHOT AS THOUGH BIN LADIN OR SADDAM MIGHT STILL ATTACK US WITH ANTHRAX. THE LIVE VIRUS ANTHRAX VACCINE WILL REINTRODUCE THE VIRUS INTO A SUSCEPTIBLE POPULATION. ASK THE BEST SCIENTISTS. THE LIVE VIRUS RUBELLA VACCINE HAS ALREADY DISABLED ONE IN FOUR AMERICANS. DO THE RESEARCH. DO THE TESTS THAT SHOW CHRONICALLY ACTIVE RUBELLA INFECTION. THE TITER COUNT TEST DOESN'T LIE. IT WAS USED TO JUSTIFY ABORTION BEFORE ABORTION WAS LEGAL. THE VERY LIFE OF A FETUS DEPENDS ON THE ACCURACY OF THAT TEST. THE MEDIA HAS BEEN AS SILENT ABOUT THE VACCINES AS THEY'VE BEEN ON ALL THE HARD EVIDENCE ABOUT THE 2000 ELECTION AND ALL THE TERRORISM. IF THEY ALLOWED ALL THOSE PEOPLE TO BE KILLED WITHOUT SCRAMBLING FIGHTER JETS OVER DC FOR TWO HOURS, THEN THEY ARE CAPABLE OF TAINTING ANTHRAX VACCINES WHICH ARE ALREADY UNSTABLE. THEY WANT YOU TO BE EITHER TOO SICK TO FIGHT THEM, OR DEAD. THEY INTEND TO GIVE THEIR RIGHT WING LOYALIST THE SAFE VACCINES, BUT YOU CAN'T CONTROL LIVE VIRUS VACCINES; THEY ARE CONTAGIOUS WHEN A LIVE VIRUS IS USED. Feel free to ask me further questions about this. Since 1979, I've had to learn more than I've ever wanted to know about vaccines.
THERE, I WARNED YOU. MARK MY WORDS.
Estrella Holtzknecht/Berosini ©copyright February 27, 2002
Permission was given to The Journal of History to reprint this information by its author, Estrella Holtzknecht/Berosini. She requested that the following be added:
Regarding the chronic rubella which is caused by both the single rubella vaccine, a.k.a. Meruvax, and the rubella found in the MMR vaccine: When you get a rubella titer test, doctors have been ordered by insurance companies to not tell you what the titer count is. If you have a titer which is above normal immunity, they tell will not tell you. They will say that you have "antibodies against rubella."
They do not tell you that any antibody count above normal immunity is either recent infection or active infection. IF THE DOCTOR REFUSES TO GIVE YOU THE ACTUAL TITER COUNT, THEN YOU MIGHT AS WELL HAVE NOT GOTTEN THE TITER TEST AT ALL. They've been changing the titers tests to make it confusing. I've had all three tests and I insisted on conversion charts which translate how the numbers have been changed. WHEN YOU GET THE RUBELLA TEST, YOU MUST REMEMBER TO INSIST ON AN ACTUAL TITER COUNT, AND YOU MUST ASK THEM WHAT TITER NUMBER INDICATES NORMAL IMMUNITY.....I've learned, from brave doctors, that anything above the normal immunity number indicates recent infection, active infection, or chronically active infection. If you don't have chronic rubella they will gladly give you the exact number. If they tell you you've got "antibodies against rubella" then you've got the disease and they want to hide that fact. I advise anyone to read medical books, written prior to 1971, to learn what viral titer counts were meant to reveal.
PREVIOUS ARTICLE NEXT ARTICLE
The Journal of History - Fall 2002 Copyright © 2002 by News Source, Inc.