The Surveillance Society Does Not Work
By Mick Meaney - RINF
May 6, 2008
Costing in excess of billions of pounds each year, every single area of the British surveillance society has been proven ill effective when dealing with crime, fraud, and terrorism – the very reasons government officials implement such measures.
Which begs the question: How can the Government justify such spending when it also imposes an increasing risk to our personal freedom and privacy? What is more, as current technology has failed to live up to the expectations of the British Government they still have widespread plans to advance citizen surveillance like we have never seen before.
The latest statistics are cause for concern. A procedure introduced in 2007 made it compulsory for all passport applicants to attend face-to-face interviews.
We were told this was a necessary measure in fraud prevention but out of 90,000 interviewees not a single criminal had been caught. The cost of the network has run into the hundreds of millions.
More statistics show the DNA database, which contains the details of over one million innocent people, has almost zero effect in solving crimes. On average just 1 in every 800 crimes will be solved and the
cost runs into the millions, turning the innocent into suspects. Each DNA sample added to the database cost £3,575 - last year the database held 660,000 samples.
Phil Booth of NO2ID said: "This utterly blows away the myth that the DNA database is the perfect detection tool. It is in fact creating-a nation of suspects."
The British DNA database contains 4.5 million samples and is the largest in the world yet it does not hold the information of terrorist suspects or serious offenders currently in jail.
Police across the EU can access the database creating what civil liberty advocates call a 'Big Brother Europe.' CCTV
Just this week it was revealed that only 3% of London street robberies were solved using CCTV. Britain is the most monitored country in the world with an average of one CCTV per every 14 people.
"Billions of pounds has been spent on kit, but no thought has gone into how the police are going to use the images and how they will be used in court. It's been an utter fiasco: only 3% of crimes were solved by CCTV. There's no fear of CCTV. Why don't people fear it?
[They think] the cameras are not working," said Detective Chief Inspector Mick Neville.
Still the development of a national facial recognition CCTV database continues at the taxpayer's expense.
What is more worrying still is the use of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act (RIPA), a spy law that was introduced in 2000 which gives the police and security services the power to monitor people and their communications. In 2002 the act was extended to include local councils allowing them to commit xtensive surveillance of its citizens.
The law was introduced to catch terrorists but is currently being used to stop benefit cheats, anti-social behaviour, graffiti, and even poor parking.
The abuse of Government authority is abundantly clear as our privacy and freedoms are needlessly stripped away while the taxpayer is forced to pay for technology which fails to protect us from criminals or terrorists.
A surveillance society simply does not work.
RINF.COM: Breaking News & Alternative Media is Copyleft - Copy & Distribute Freely. News Forum
The Journal of History - Spring 2009 Copyright © 2009 by News Source, Inc.